Saturday, January 21, 2012

Guided to Frustration

After I tested out my new site for online dating, I quickly learned that I was not a fan of it at all. The site has two different methods of communication. I believe they do this in an effort to help those who are socially awkward. How sweet. You choose which method you prefer: Guided or Open. One communication is normal—if you are sent a person you seem to like, then you can email them and sit and cross your fingers that they will email you back. Or, if you see a person you seem to like, you can send them 5 multiple choice questions to answer. Then they respond, and you send your questions. And then they respond, and they ask you something else stupid. And then you ask them something else stupid, and…oh, you get it. Here’s my favorite part of guided communication, though…The Essay. I promise you this is real. After you and your socially awkward counterpart have made it through 3 rounds of questioning (what is this, a police interrogation?!), you reach the final stage: Sending 3 “final” questions that are to be responded to in short answer style. Even better, is that there is a time limit. Talk about nerve racking. I quickly learned to type up my responses in a Word document so I could revisit it and make whatever changes, and then I copied and pasted it in the site box seconds before clicking send. And there it goes. Off into online space where it will never been responded to.

Throughout my 3 month subscription, I emailed with 3 people who were biologically supposed to be men, although their actions don’t support that. I put in so much effort to respond to their questions because they were too annoying to have Open communication, and since it wasn’t “my turn” I couldn’t freely email them. One guy and I were answering-questions-communicating, and it finally reached the email point. I had left for a 3 day trip. On the third day, he closed communication with me citing I “had taken too long to respond.” Ohhhhh k, buddy. I think I’ll take advantage of the feature where I can click a button that will send a response to him that said something like “Oh, that’s too bad, you should reconsider because I think we have potential.” Please, child, we didn’t really have potential, but I wanted him to open it back up so I could tell him how stupid he was for canceling me when I was traveling without internet access. Which is precisely what I proceeded to do. I had countless guys “close” communication with me—in midcommunication. Talk about rude.

I did finally coax a guy into giving me his digits, and when I called, I never heard back. I was always proud of my beautifully crafted “Final Round” responses, and it seemed ridiculous to me that I couldn’t just email normally, but instead I had to wait for an answer since it was the other person’s turn to communicate. We’re not 5 years old. We already know how to converse.

In the end, it was this hand holding that made me realize match was a much better fit for me. I could communicate openly. I wasn’t subjected to intense scrutiny over whether or not I will be a social butterfly in every single situation or if I will wait a few minutes to be introduced to people (that's just 1 of the multiple choice questions you can send to your potential soul mate). I came to peace with my wasted subscription when I knew that I would never like anyone who didn’t feel comfortable enough to have a simple conversation and making a decision from that. Like and love should be that—simple. 

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Disharmony


Okay, confession. Awhile ago, I turned my back on match. I was seeing the same guys come up in my searches over and over and over again, and it seemed like many of them weren’t really wanting anything serious. Oh, and by seemed, I mean that they would explicitly say in their profiles “not looking for anything serious, let’s have fun and see what happens.” This reputation of non-seriousness has apparently become synonymous with match, but there are people like that in real life so it is what it is. Even if match isn’t based around compatibility criteria, there’s something to be said for reading someone’s profile and looking at their picture and just knowing that they’re The One—to wink at or email and cross your fingers that they actually respond, and then maybe, just maybe, a get together can be set. My attention and match-finding focus turned toward using a different online dating site that believes people will find love based on common qualities, values, and interests. That’s tough for those of us who are really not good people at our core, but at this point, I had nothing to lose. Except a ton of money and hours of question-answering.

I got roped into the 3 month minimum subscription for my new dating site with a payment that ended up being roughly $1, 253. I didn’t realize I was on Millionaire Matchmaker here, but maybe this stuff works. I sat down at my computer and answered every. single. question. as if I were taking a college final exam. Except this isn’t a college exam, this is supposed to be my gateway to finding love! There was no profile to create. There was no method of letting your personality come through. It was all very, well, computerized. Everyone answered the same mostly-multiple-choice questions and that constituted your profile. I wanted my match back, why did I ever leave? I was doubtful of this. I trust myself enough that I can follow my heart to a potential soulmate instead of following what a computer system tells me. Then again, I’m still single. So, that robot did beat those people on Jeopardy, right? Maybe the robot will also rock as Cupid?